“ ”
The “il y a” is the container of the collective other, the repository of the prehistory of the alterity of all these others. The “il y a” continues to consume all otherness and the strangeness that human subjectivity expulses, becoming more and more inclusive and extended in the present time when human subjectivity is intense or turbulent. On this basis, the more the container of the collective other is extended, the more it means that the archetype driving social subjectivity is alterity.
This archetype drives the otherness of the subject and at the same time extends the primordial hyle on which the alterity’s subject existence in otherness depends. The basis constituted by the difference of the hyle gives rise to an absolute orphaned-isolation. When it is taken over by other extensions, the process becomes an infinite exteriority of "de-alienation", and the subject in otherness is in infinite schizo-fragmenting-ness. The subject in the alterity of the self-subject fills the “il y a” with its paradigm of division. It is an obscurity that has no shelter, a darkness that is not watched. But it is the darkness of the night that surveys on the darker activities to which it aspires.
Homage to Blanchot and Levinas